Re: BEFORE Trying To Simply Hike the Fuel Tax . . .

> > > > > > The deal needs to include a revenue neutral IRS rebate to cover
=
the
> > > > > > increase in federal fuel taxes.
> > > > > > The overall effect is drivers would be paid to use less fuel.
> > > > > > Anyone who ****fts away from driving or at least from driving
low=
 mpg
> > > > > > vehicles would come out ahead economically and anyone who
really=

> > > > > > needed to drive to work or drive a truck to work would still
be =
able
> > > > > > to afford it.
> > > > > Using taxes to make people do what you want is a very slippery
slo=
pe.
>
> > > > Which is what? =EF=BF=BDForking over less money to despotic
nations =
for oil?
>
> > > > Bret Cahill
>
> > > Exactly. You have decided
>
> > I'm not in charge of fiscal policy. =C2=A0The _people_ will have
decided=
..
>
> a people's tax.

If you don't like the people changing fiscal policy the proper remedy
is to amend the Constitution so that only Republicons can change it.

=2E . .

> > If you want to continue handing billions over to oil rich despotims
> > then you need to persuade voters.
>
> > . . . .
>
> > > So what comes next?
>
> > Anything that falls under Art. I Sec. 8.
>
> > Next question?

?  ?  ?


Bret Cahill