On May 15, 1:17 am, orangata...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On 15 May, 07:03, Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 14, 11:37 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > It's much worse than that.
>
> > > By their own admission the "market" economists are too stupid to
> > > answer a simple self evident truth:
>
> > > "Does free speech precede each and every free trade?"
>
> > > There is no way you can pretend to be a "market" economist and claim
> > > to be too stupid to answer that question.
>
> > > Bret Cahill
>
> > of course you are right. and, is every participant in a transaction
> > rational? of course not. our jails and metal institutions are full of
> > people who were looking out for their own self interests.
>
> So we should take everyone's money and belongings away from them and
> supply them with the stuff you think they should have?
>
typical response from a chanter. where did i ever say that. that
response could be construed as insane.
> > "our state and nation have experienced major declines resulting from
> > contem****ary conservative leaders and their simplistic ideas. their
> > dour polices regularly fail to connect the dots, let alone comprehend
> > the space between them."
> > "The game of Darwinian economics and the enshrinement of market-
> > miracle
> > theology is really the systematic looting of the pockets and purses of
> > the middle class"
> > Jerry M. Landay of Bristol
>
> "Many people want the government to protect the consumer. A much more
> urgent problem is to protect the consumer from the government"
> Milton Friedman
a fine machavillion, orwellian double speak. housing debacle anyone.
of course, you are so hard wired, you will not understand the
connotations of that example.
|
