Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Play Stock Market Games
Fantasy Stock Picking Contest

Investments > Investing Science > Re: Friedman's ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 3 Topic 15548 of 17599
Post > Topic >>

Re: Friedman's Folly

by Bret Cahill <BretCahill@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 15, 2008 at 12:32 PM

> >> >> Friedman was an issue dodger just like all the remaining ****lls at
GOP
> >> >> "thank" tanks like Hoover, Heritage, Am. Enterprise, the Chicago
> >> >> School, etc.
>
> >> >> Friedman would never address the land issues raised by the
Georgists
> >> >> and he'ld never touch the "free markets w/o free speech" issue
either.
>
> >> >> When you dodge issues that are fundamental to your field you are a
> >> >> fraud.
>
> >> > Care for some cheese with that whine?
>
> >> > Yeah, and let us know when you win a Nobel Prize.
>
> >> It's also a classic straw man. "I'll decide what issues should be
> >> fundamental to 'your field',
>
> > The precondition of free markets is of no concern to free marketry?
>
> Not directly.


The direct effect of censor****p is that free markets are impossible.

Are you saying that free marketeers do not care if we have free
markets or not?

This is certainly not true for GOP ****ll tank "market" economists.

That's why they dodge The Question:

They fear free speech and free markets more than anyone.


Bret Cahill
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Re: Friedman's Folly
Bret Cahill <BretCahil  2008-05-15 12:32:30 
Re: Friedman's Folly
"Econotron" <  2008-05-15 20:50:57 
Re: Friedman's Folly
David Johnston <david@  2008-05-21 17:31:03 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 4:52:53 CST 2008.