Re: BEFORE Trying To Simply Hike the Fuel Tax . . .

The Trucker wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 11:25:49 -0500, ItWasAnInsideJob wrote:
> 
>> The Trucker wrote:
>>> On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:40:51 -0500, ItWasAnInsideJob wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Trucker wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 13 May 2008 12:53:25 -0500, ItWasAnInsideJob wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The Trucker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but perhaps to increase the progressive nature of the tax system
>>>>>>>
>>>>> Any time you want to restore the context of what I was saying we
>>>>> might have a discussion.  Otherwise, piss on you.
>>>>>
>>>> Okay:
>>>>
>>>>> That is economic reality and there is nothing that should be done
>>>>> about it but perhaps to increase the progressive nature of the tax
>>>>> system and redistribute benefits at the bottom where people are
being
>>>>> put our of work due to the increasing efficiencies.
>>  >>
>>>> You stated: "increase the progressive nature of the tax system".
>>>>
>>>> ****ing communist.
>>> You obviously have no clue what a Communist is or what the progressive
>>> income tax is designed to do.
>>>
>>
>> You must have missed communist plank #2, previously posted:
>>
>>      2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
>>
>> "[I]ncreas[ing] the progressive nature of the tax system" is the point 
>> you stated.
>>
>> You agree with the communists, therefore you are one.
>>
>> ****ing communist.
> 
> That is typical rightardedness.  If I agree with my wife I must be a
wife.
> 

So now you admit to wearing a dress and being a communist.