Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Investments > Investing Science > Re: Friedman's ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 15553 of 16038
Post > Topic >>

Re: Friedman's Folly

by Video61@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 15, 2008 at 07:45 PM

On May 15, 7:54 pm, "sinister" <sinis...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Bret Cahill" <BretCah...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:88ec7336-1eba-4980-9600-28c2a4d6e62c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Friedman was an issue dodger just like all the remaining ****lls at GOP
> > "thank" tanks like Hoover, Heritage, Am. Enterprise, the Chicago
> > School, etc.
>
> > Friedman would never address the land issues raised by the Georgists
> > and he'ld never touch the "free markets w/o free speech" issue either.
>
> Actually, that's not _quite_ true.
>
> Friedman (I'm assuming you're referring to Milton) said that the best
tax
> was the tax proposed by Henry George.
>
> I have the impression that he wasn't as sympathetic to the Georgist
program
> as the quote attributed to him would indicate---he specifically called
land
> value taxation "the least bad tax"---but he at least understand and
partly
> approved of the program.
>
>
>
> > When you dodge issues that are fundamental to your field you are a
> > fraud.
>
> > Bret Cahill

 but, there is that insinuation that all taxes on unproductive wealth
is bad. which is one of the basis of neo-liberalsim.
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: Friedman's Folly
Video61@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-15 19:45:39 
Re: Friedman's Folly
"sinister" <  2008-05-16 19:12:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Jul 9 10:09:50 CDT 2008.