On May 16, 9:15 am, orangata...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On 15 May, 15:10, Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 15, 1:17 am, orangata...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > > On 15 May, 07:03, Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > > > On May 14, 11:37 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > It's much worse than that.
>
> > > > > By their own admission the "market" economists are too stupid to
> > > > > answer a simple self evident truth:
>
> > > > > "Does free speech precede each and every free trade?"
>
> > > > > There is no way you can pretend to be a "market" economist and
claim
> > > > > to be too stupid to answer that question.
>
> > > > > Bret Cahill
>
> > > > of course you are right. and, is every participant in a
transaction
> > > > rational? of course not. our jails and metal institutions are full
of
> > > > people who were looking out for their own self interests.
>
> > > So we should take everyone's money and belongings away from them and
> > > supply them with the stuff you think they should have?
>
> > typical response from a chanter. where did i ever say that. that
> > response could be construed as insane.
>
> > > > "our state and nation have experienced major declines resulting
from
> > > > contem****ary conservative leaders and their simplistic ideas.
their
> > > > dour polices regularly fail to connect the dots, let alone
comprehend
> > > > the space between them."
> > > > "The game of Darwinian economics and the enshrinement of market-
> > > > miracle
> > > > theology is really the systematic looting of the pockets and
purses of
> > > > the middle class"
> > > > Jerry M. Landay of Bristol
>
> > > "Many people want the government to protect the consumer. A much
more
> > > urgent problem is to protect the consumer from the government"
> > > Milton Friedman
>
> > a fine machavillion, orwellian double speak. housing debacle anyone.
> > of course, you are so hard wired, you will not understand the
> > connotations of that example.- Hide quoted text -
>
> again, you offer no thoughts of your own. you wait for someone else to
> say something and then spew abuse. what type of response are you
> expecting?
they simply said it better than i can. of course, you never refute it.
|
