Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Investments > Investing Science > Re: the rightar...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 15563 of 16030
Post > Topic >>

Re: the rightard refuted nothing, typical, snicker.

by Video61@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 16, 2008 at 03:24 PM

On May 16, 4:30 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <93a9a454-c30c-4a50-8cb9-bfeb5880d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
>  Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > On May 15, 5:49 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <238c918b-9318-4f99-9fcb-5004f3d2e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> > >  Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > > > On May 14, 8:40 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
> > > > > Love the sound of whining leftards.
>
> > > > > Snicker.
> > > >  we are not whining, we are coming from a position of knowledge.
> > > > something that alludes (sic) rightards.
> > > Snicker.
> >  typical, you have refuted nothing, which means you have nothing.
>
> Snicker.

 is that the snicker of a hysterical crank that cannot refute that
miltons nobel was actually fraud:)
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: the rightard refuted nothing, typical, snicker.
Video61@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-16 15:24:12 
Re: the rightard refuted nothing, typical, snicker.
Harold Burton <hal.i.b  2008-05-17 16:44:21 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Jul 8 23:23:04 CDT 2008.