Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Investments > Investing Science > Re: Friedman's ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 6 Topic 15566 of 16030
Post > Topic >>

Re: Friedman's Folly

by sbm2006@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 16, 2008 at 04:59 PM

On May 15, 5:52 pm, Les Cargill <lcarg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > On May 15, 6:12 pm, Les Cargill <lcarg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >>> On May 15, 1:09 am, orangata...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >> <snip>
>
> >>>  machavillion freedom. freedom to do what, to whom, for what? you
are
> >>> a indoctrinated fool.
> >> You've shown repeatedly that you don't understand either of
> >> Machiavelli nor Friedman.
>
> >  sure i do.
>
> I wonder.
>
> > its you that is the chanter.
>
> I think the first thing I ever posted to sci.econ, back when
> David ran it, was "... but people aren't rational." He advised me
> to look up "normative assumption." Which I did. That was a good
> day.
>
>  >
>   so, if freidman says all
>
> > information is perfect, markets are perfect, and all persons involved
> > in a transaction are rational, and have correct, perfect information.
>
> I have to agree - this one thing of Friedman's continues
> to bedevil people. I interpret it as being like the
> frictionless billiard-ball physics of ninth graders - he
> was simplifying the message to make it a mass message. But
> he's going to the market as a source of information itself,
> which is what was intended to impress people.
>
> Indeed, I don't think you can talk about comparative
> advantage without *im*perfect information. *People* are
> *im*perfect. Groupthink happens; that is why we have
> bubbles and whatnot.
>
> But I don't really know what he intended with all that, and
> it's largely beside the point. I think this
> is a lot more interesting:
>
> http://www.janegalt.net/blog/archives/004833.html
>
> > that is a straight shooter, who does not practice double speak. or, he
> > was a idiot, possibly insane not to understand his fellow human being,
> > and completely ignorant of history. which was he?
>
> Why, he might simply have been.... *im*perfect. :) Newton
> was just absolutely insane at points, but his work is highly
> useful. Old Milton was far from crazy.
>
> >  all fascism is, is libertarianism in decay.
>
> Well okay then. And all up is down, and all blue is green. Bully! All
> this stuff headends in human psychology, which is ... ugly.
>
> "What's the ugliest part of your body? It could be your mind." - Frank
> Zappa.
>
> >> --
> >> Les Cargill
>
> --
> Les Cargill

He took one look at Pinochet's Chile, and lamented; "Political
freedom, once established, tends to destroy economic freedom."  In
other words, to have a healthy economy you have to be run by a
ruthless dictator.

Case closed.
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Re: Friedman's Folly
sbm2006@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-16 16:59:29 
Re: Friedman's Folly
Les Cargill <lcargill@  2008-05-16 22:36:36 
Re: Friedman's Folly
"John Galt" <  2008-05-17 08:22:23 
Re: Friedman's Folly
retrogrouch@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-16 22:13:48 
Re: Friedman's Folly
Les Cargill <lcargill@  2008-05-17 02:20:00 
Re: Friedman's Folly
retrogrouch@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-17 14:48:32 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Jul 8 23:00:30 CDT 2008.