On 16 May, 00:28, Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On May 15, 6:12 pm, Les Cargill <lcarg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > On May 15, 1:09 am, orangata...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > <snip>
>
> > > =A0machavillion freedom. freedom to do what, to whom, for what? you
ar=
e
> > > a indoctrinated fool.
>
> > You've shown repeatedly that you don't understand either of
> > Machiavelli nor Friedman.
>
> =A0sure i do. its you that is the chanter. so, if freidman says all
> information is perfect, markets are perfect, and all persons involved
this is just rubbish. information does not have to be perfect for
trade to be free. all that is required is for someone to want to sell
something and someone else to want to buy it. perfect information is
not necessary.
> in a transaction are rational, and have correct, perfect information.
> that is a straight shooter, who does not practice double speak. or, he
> was a idiot, possibly insane not to understand his fellow human being,
> and completely ignorant of history. which was he?
> =A0all fascism is, is libertarianism in decay.
>
wrong. fascism requires a strong central government. libertarians want
the state to be a small as possible. it is socialists, like you, who
want a strong government. in fact it is socialism that requires a
strong state. a small state is not capable of taking a large fraction
of everone's income by force (this is called 'tax').
every regulation imposed by government restricts freedom. clearly some
regulations are necessary, but libertarians want as few restrictions
on their personal freedom as possible. this includes being free to
earn their own money and spend their own money. socialists (like you)
want the state to forcably take other people's money and spend it.
thus transfering power from the individual to the state.
|
