"Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:VJqdneE706kPzrPVnZ2dnUVZ_oSunZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "John Galt" <whoisjohngalt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:SLrXj.35073$dq6.22266@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:MrudnfUySZKUq7PVnZ2dnUVZ_q3inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "John Galt" <whoisjohngalt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:dfiXj.74847$pm2.5641@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>> <retrogrouch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:nr8r2450outt2op4ipc4djv8b4nvpqaoio@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 13:04:11 +0530, "John Galt"
>>>>> <whoisjohngalt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>><retrogrouch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:tj8q24punnraomov9r1624m14mvkggb6mt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 07:58:05 +0530, "John Galt"
>>>>>>> <whoisjohngalt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> NO. If people say they are happy then they are happy. It is
not
>>>>>>>>> up to
>>>>>>>>> you to tell them what makes them happy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You're suggesting that people will be happy with less money to
spend
>>>>>>>>next
>>>>>>>>year than they do this year?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Seriously?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you honestly believe wealth and happiness are related. LOL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wealth? Who said anything about wealth? I'm talking about raising
>>>>>>families.
>>>>>>I'm talking about food on the table, enough money for your kid to
play
>>>>>>Little League, having your kid's birthday party at Chuckie Cheese,
or
>>>>>>maybe
>>>>>>if you can afford piano lessons for your daughter. At the lower and
>>>>>>middle
>>>>>>class layers of society, you're damn right money is tied to
happiness.
>>>>>>If it
>>>>>>wasn't, money wouldn't be continually cited as one of the primary
>>>>>>causes of
>>>>>>divorce.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nonsense.
>>>>
>>>> Then feed me more than your personal anecdotes in refutation.
>>>
>>> Look who's demanding more than anecdotes.
>>
>> That was pretty much the response I figured I'd get.
>
> It's what you ****ing *deserve*, hypocrite.
Give it a rest. You criticized my position because it was anecdotal. The
proper response would have been with a non-anecdotal refutation. You
passed
on the op****tunity to respond constructively, using instead a personal
attack, and now you continue with further content-free flame-throwing.
Do you have a purpose for your participation in USENET, or do you just get
a
woody from being an ass?
Free free to vent. You appear to have plenty of anger. Entertain us a bit.
JG
|
