In article
<e51e1103-6f80-40fc-a8b3-218734aabce0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Video61@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On May 16, 4:30 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > In article
> > <93a9a454-c30c-4a50-8cb9-bfeb5880d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >
> > Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > On May 15, 5:49 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > >
<238c918b-9318-4f99-9fcb-5004f3d2e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >
> > > > Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > > > On May 14, 8:40 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Love the sound of whining leftards.
> >
> > > > > > Snicker.
> > > > > we are not whining, we are coming from a position of knowledge.
> > > > > something that alludes (sic) rightards.
> > > > Snicker.
> > > typical, you have refuted nothing, which means you have nothing.
> >
> > Snicker.
>
> is that the snicker of a hysterical crank that cannot refute that
> miltons nobel was actually fraud:)
It's the snicker of someone who finds your nonsense hysterical.
Snicker.
|
