On May 21, 3:04 pm, David Johnston <da...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008 12:01:06 -0700 (PDT), Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >On May 21, 12:31 pm, David Johnston <da...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 15 May 2008 12:32:30 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
>
> >> <BretCah...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> > The precondition of free markets is of no concern to free
marketry?
>
> >> >> Not directly.
>
> >> >The direct effect of censor****p is that free markets are impossible.
>
> >> The platonic ideal of free market is impossible with or without
> >> censor****p. But functionally it doesn't matter much whether you jail
> >> people for grumbling about the government. Commerce can continue and
> >> people can choose who to buy from and what price they will demand
when
> >> they sell. That's free enough to get buy.
>
> > talk about a silly scenario. humans that are educated, and not
> >insane, crave human rights. so far there have been no successful free
> >market, nor fascist economy, freidman even said so when approached by
> >pinochet. but, being the good psychopath that freidman was, he tried
> >anyways, and failed.
>
> I have no idea what you are talkin gabout.
you have basically described what all libertarians strive for. a free
market without human rights. i simply pointed out to you that so far
that has never worked.
|
