On May 21, 11:23 pm, David Johnston <da...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008 18:34:18 -0700 (PDT), Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >On May 21, 8:09 pm, David Johnston <da...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 21 May 2008 17:30:00 -0700 (PDT), Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> >On May 21, 5:33 pm, David Johnston <da...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 21 May 2008 13:12:54 -0700 (PDT), Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> >> >On May 21, 3:04 pm, David Johnston <da...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Wed, 21 May 2008 12:01:06 -0700 (PDT), Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> >> >On May 21, 12:31 pm, David Johnston <da...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 15 May 2008 12:32:30 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
>
> >> >> >> >> <BretCah...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > The precondition of free markets is of no concern to
free marketry?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Not directly.
>
> >> >> >> >> >The direct effect of censor****p is that free markets are
impossible.
>
> >> >> >> >> The platonic ideal of free market is impossible with or
without
> >> >> >> >> censor****p. But functionally it doesn't matter much whether
you jail
> >> >> >> >> people for grumbling about the government. Commerce can
continue and
> >> >> >> >> people can choose who to buy from and what price they will
demand when
> >> >> >> >> they sell. That's free enough to get buy.
>
> >> >> >> > talk about a silly scenario. humans that are educated, and
not
> >> >> >> >insane, crave human rights. so far there have been no
successful free
> >> >> >> >market, nor fascist economy, freidman even said so when
approached by
> >> >> >> >pinochet. but, being the good psychopath that freidman was, he
tried
> >> >> >> >anyways, and failed.
>
> >> >> >> I have no idea what you are talking about.
>
> >> >> > you have basically described what all libertarians strive for. a
free
> >> >> >market without human rights. i simply pointed out to you that so
far
> >> >> >that has never worked.
>
> >> >> It's pretty much the case in Hong Kong and they are managing to do
> >> >> business.
>
> >> > your response is typical libertarian. you have just reinforced my
> >> >opinion of libertarians.
>
> >> That's an interesting trick given that I'm not a libertarian.
>
> > then why answer like one.
>
> I didn't. A libertarian would generally argue that economic freedom
> and freedom of speech were inseparable.
>
baloney, whenever someone points out that they are being cheated, or
that there is fraud going on in the market. libertarians tell them to
do business with someone else, or, its their own fault for being
cheated.
>
>
> >> your feverish attempt at
>
> >> >saying there is no democracy, over looks the massive street protests
> >> >in hong kong since china retook the city.
>
> >> So?
>
> > you made the stupid statement, i firmly refuted it.
>
> No you didn't. Street protests are not democracy.
ROTFLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I SIMPLY CANNOT REFUTE YOUR IMPECCABLE LOGIC. I AM LAUGHING TO HARD
TO ATTEMPT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
