Re: Motivation for the Oil Barons

Fred Weiss wrote:
> On May 17, 7:48 pm, Day Brown <daybr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> ...There are new technologies out
>> there the leader****p and boardrooms dont see because of group think.
> 
> New technologies with significant profit potential?
> 
> You see it but they don't?
> 
> Do you know what delusions of grandeur is? "If only Day Brown was in
> charge"!
> 
> In fact the oil industry spends billions of dollars on new
> technologies - to make it economical to drill in the tundra or in the
> raging waters of the N. Sea or in the deep waters in the Gulf of
> Mexico. They are investing billions now in tar sands. They would be
> happy to spend billions in ANWR or in restricted coastal waters.
> 
> Don't blame them, Sparky. Blame the enviroNazis.
I'm not the only one by any means Fred. But we dont control the media, 
so you dont know about it. There's a new process developed at the U of 
MI with an aluminum alloy, that when exposed to water, gives off 
hydrogen. A one pound canister of the alloy and 20 gallons of water will 
drive your car 600 miles. Then when you get home, you can plug it into 
the grid and recharge the canister.

Wind power is calculated to amortize the investment at only $0.04/kwhr. 
there's a new wind turbine blade manufacturing facility going up at 
Little Rock. The blades are 66 meters long, but can be ****pped by barge 
up the Arkansas river onto the Great Plains. 3 of these blades will 
power a 20 megawatt turbine, and go up gonzo faster than a nuke at a 
much lower cost/megawatt.

One problem with windpower is that it is *dispersed*. Small investors 
can get in on the ground floor, and farmers can also get a cut. With a 
nuke, the only people who profit are the friends of the power structure.
       ---- Posted via Pronews.com - Premium Cor****ate Usenet News
Provider ----
http://www.pronews.com
offers cor****ate packages that have access to
100,000+ newsgroups